Théorie et critique du projet MA1 (Gardelegui et Widmer)
AR-401(at) / 12 crédits
Enseignant(s): Garcia Gardelegui Blanca, Widmer Pham Ariane Chantal
Langue: Français
Retrait: Il n'est pas autorisé de se retirer de cette matière après le délai d'inscription.
Remarque: Inscription faite par la section
Résumé
À travers une analyse cartographique des démolitions planifiées et des initiatives de densification dans la région de Genève, les étudiants remettront en question le statu quo en découvrant le potentiel des ressources existantes sur quatre échelles : régionale, urbaine, architecturale et matérielle.
Contenu
COMPOSE-RE-COMPOSE
Fall 2024 Design Studio
Office Hours as requested
The official language will be French but students who prefer to communicate in English, Spanish and German are also welcome
Brief : Demolition as Resource in the Geneva region
As the urban population and the urgency of the environmental crises (climate, biodiversity, water) and social issues (aging, inequalities, individualization) continue to grow exponentially, the need for inner urban development increases. This development asks for careful attention to the existing: buildings, infrastructures, and urban neglected areas (tabula scripta). This new context imposes a transscalar approach and a global understanding of the resources. It also adds new complexities to the question of composition. It imposes, more than ever, precise and sensitive architectural responses. This situation presses us to seek appropriate models for an approach to the territory, the architecture, the materials, and the questions of use and aesthetics.
As we live through this time of transition, the role of the architect needs to be radically transformed to master concepts of regeneration, reuse, and reprogramming, at all four scales: material, architectural, urban, and regional. In these circumstances, the architect's role goes far beyond the "architectural production" and thinking in terms of the object, frozen within its parcel boundaries. Architects must open up to a holistic way of thinking, curating potential in the existing city. They must understand the urban environment as a source of materials, buildings, spaces, and uses. This requires an ability to handle concepts such as carbon literacy, resource management, the energetic impact of their projects, and effective communication strategies to facilitate collective decision-making. In this context, the architectural decision gains importance compared to the usual urban planning processes. It claims to transform what already exists and adapt the scales to it.
This process cannot only be considered as a response to the need for densification but also as an opportunity for the shaping of the city to continue. Additionally, the process of urban transformation must offer solutions to social, cultural, environmental and economic requirements. Repairing and regenerative processes must integrate sensitive attention towards the past. It is time to learn from the vernacular and its global approach. How can we build our future cities based on a circular non-extractive approach to resources?
Mots-clés
Densification, Adaptive ReUse, Programming, Resources, Demolitions, Regeneration, Carbon Literacy, Composition
Acquis de formation
A la fin de ce cours l'étudiant doit être capable de:
- Understand the built environment as a whole and at various scales in order to identify appropriate intervention levels and design processes.
- Prioritize project strategies according to a hierarchy that maximizes impact with minimal effort supporting a sustainable urban development.
- View projects as dynamic processes involving multiple stakeholders.
- Use projects as tools for research, analysis, and design.
Méthode d'enseignement
Teaching methodology: Project based, transcalar and cross disciplinary
Ariane Widmer and Blanca Gardelegui will co-teach "compose-re-compose," combining their expertise in urban planning, architecture, and materiality. They will explore urban densification from an architect's perspective, focusing on the potential of existing neighborhoods, spaces, buildings, and resources. Their approach emphasizes reusing resources and promoting adaptive reuse, densification, and programmatic flexibility.
The aim is to reimagine urban densification and planning to integrate circularity, fostering a sustainable and adaptable urban environment. This issue requires a multi-faceted approach in schools: project based, transcalar and cross disciplinary. The acquired experience must be questioned, adapted, and passed on, addressing environmental and social emergencies.The work of the students will be individual and constantly retrofitted by the collective input.
Travail attendu
Workflow: Design strategies to uncover potential in the existing
Based on a cartographic analysis of the demolition of buildings in the Geneva region, the students will undertake research into the reasons for demolition on a regional scale. On this basis and focusing on smaller selected sectors of the city, they will then assess the potential for densification, extension, adaptation, and reprogramming, and propose design strategies on an architectural scale, both for the building (structure, energy, reuse, and local materials) and on an urban scale, for the neighborhood (mix, diversity, services) based on the principle of the city of short distances.
Méthode d'évaluation
Students will work at four scales: Material (20%), Architectural (30%), Urban(30%), and Regional (20%), with a corresponding scale weighted for the semester's evaluation.
Ressources
Bibliographie
Bibliography will be provided at the beginning of the semester.
Ressources en bibliothèque
- Genève en plans: De Maurice Braillard à André Marais / Gfeller
- How buildings learn: What happens after they're built / Brand
Liens Moodle
Préparation pour
Summer reading
Gfeller, P. (Ed.). (n.d.). Genève en plans: De Maurice Braillard à André Marais. Éditions d'en bas.
Brand, S. (1994). How buildings learn: What happens after they're built. Penguin Books.
Dans les plans d'études
- Semestre: Automne
- Forme de l'examen: Pendant le semestre (session d'hiver)
- Matière examinée: Théorie et critique du projet MA1 (Gardelegui et Widmer)
- Cours: 2 Heure(s) hebdo x 14 semaines
- Projet: 4 Heure(s) hebdo x 14 semaines
- Type: obligatoire
- Semestre: Automne
- Forme de l'examen: Pendant le semestre (session d'hiver)
- Matière examinée: Théorie et critique du projet MA1 (Gardelegui et Widmer)
- Cours: 2 Heure(s) hebdo x 14 semaines
- Projet: 4 Heure(s) hebdo x 14 semaines
- Type: obligatoire
- Semestre: Automne
- Forme de l'examen: Pendant le semestre (session d'hiver)
- Matière examinée: Théorie et critique du projet MA1 (Gardelegui et Widmer)
- Cours: 2 Heure(s) hebdo x 14 semaines
- Projet: 4 Heure(s) hebdo x 14 semaines
- Type: optionnel
Semaine de référence
Lu | Ma | Me | Je | Ve | |
8-9 | |||||
9-10 | |||||
10-11 | |||||
11-12 | |||||
12-13 | |||||
13-14 | |||||
14-15 | |||||
15-16 | |||||
16-17 | |||||
17-18 | |||||
18-19 | |||||
19-20 | |||||
20-21 | |||||
21-22 |