AR-301(ah) / 12 credits

Teacher: Malterre-Barthes Charlotte

Language: English

Withdrawal: It is not allowed to withdraw from this subject after the registration deadline.

Remark: Inscription faite par la section


Summary

This drawing based research studio examines construction as nested systems of material extraction, exploitation, cultural production, and value generation. It seeks to unpack, reveal, and communicate the complexity of actors and forces shaping contemporary space production.

Content

Fall 2026 Design Studio


Date/Time: Mondays and Tuesdays
Monday: 10:00-12:00, 13:00-19:00
Tuesday: 10:00 - 12:00, 15:00-19:00a
Office Hours as requested
Credits: 12
Location: Varies, See Studio Schedule
SG 2211 - Studio Space

 

This class is taught in English.

 

Teaching Team: Charlotte Malterre-Barthes charlotte.malterrebarthes@epfl.ch, Antoine Iweins antoine.iweinsdeeckhoutte@epfl.ch, Nathalie Marj nathalie.marj@epfl.ch
TAs: Lydia Genecand lydia.genecand@epfl.ch & Clemence Quenis clemence.quenis@epfl.ch

 

Teaching Format
Depending on enrollment, students will work in groups of two/three after the first week. Each desk crit will require the attendance of at least 2 student groups for peer-to-peer feedback. Desk crits will happen on a weekly or bi-weekly basis. All group attendance is required for episode reviews, guest lectures, mid-term, and final reviews. Please note that some lectures may be held online.

 


Estimated Costs
1 day trip: max- 150-200.- (travel + food)[a]
Prints: All materials can be printed on A3 black and white printers. Plotter prints are optional.
Model Materials: We encourage working with discarded/reused materials.

Course Description:


The Architecture of Construction

"Each small moment of convenience - be it answering a question, turning on a light, or playing a song - requires a vast planetary network, fueled by the extraction of non-renewable materials, labor, and data"
Kate Crawford and Vladan Joler, "Anatomy of an AI System: The Amazon Echo as an Anatomical Map of Human Labor, Data and Planetary Resources," AI Now Institute and Share Lab, September 7, 2018, https://anatomyof.ai/.

 

On May 27, 2010, EPFL President Patrick Aebischer, Federal Councillor Didier Burkhalter, and Pritzker Prize winner architects Kazuyo Sejima and Ryue Nishizawa (SAANA), inaugurated the Rolex Learning Center on campus. Burkhalter declared the building "a new jewel in the crown that Switzerland's university system represents." Along these legitimate actors, a constellation of corporate sponsors, Rolex, Logitech, Bouygues Construction, Credit Suisse, Nestle, Novartis, and SICPA were present to the opening ceremony, alerting to the complex financing scheme the 110 Millions CHF building was relying upon. 4,300 m3 of concrete were poured, supplied by Holcim, from its sites in Morges and Bussigny; the metal partitions were produced by R. Morand & Fils SA, the glass casings by Bodenmann. But beyond its celebration as architectural innovation, the building is also a financial arrangement, a material supply chain, a labor operation, and an identity-building tool, grounded in emerging public-private partnerships and neoliberal schemes of the mid 2000s.The Rolex Learning Center is just one example of  what this research studio is interested in examining, namely architecture and construction as nested systems of material extraction, exploitation, regulatory and governance mechanisms, cultural production, and value generation- that all become the built environment, and the architecture of our lives. Claiming a decidedly architectural approach based on skills unique to our discipline, research methodologies grounded in diagrams and drawing, the studio seeks to unpack, reveal, and communicate the complexity of actors and forces shaping space production and how do they do so-from clients, to funding bodies, banks and real estate developers, material manufacturers and extraction sites, norm-writing institutions, to architecture firms and structural engineering companies, BET, governance and permit-emitting bureaux, contractors and construction companies, labor force and subcontracting chains, unions and insurances companies, to property-managing firms and cleaning bodies, users and communities, and demolition and waste management firms. It should culminate in a collective visual-a large-scale fresco that synthesizes the political economy of construction in Switzerland into a single drawing.

We are interested in disentangling architecture and its expression, the construction industry, material economies, and various forms of value from land to culture. We will openly discuss the extractive systems- the racialisation of labour and ecological harm for instance, upon which our discipline relies and trace this through several case studies. We will design narratives to explain the research- "'looking sideways' in the archive for archival silences (Christianse), and the possibilities inherent in poetics, rumours (Baderoon), drawing (Loewenson) and performing (Koleka)."[1]
We will deploy our abilities as architects to conduct scientific research, justify findings, communicate ideas and concepts, articulate these through texts and diagrams, centering drawing techniques and methods to disentangle, critique and transmit the political economy that underpins our discipline.

Site & Trip

We will work in real-life conditions of architecture and construction in the context of Switzerland.


Scales

This studio is based on a conception of urban design as a multidimensional trans-scalar discipline. Not only political, economic, social, cultural, and geo-tectonic forces affect and shape the built environment at the planetary and global scale, at the territorial and landscape scale, at the neighborhood and urban scale, down to the architectural and material scale - and to the body of the human and more-than-human, but space and its arrangements have a reciprocating effect on these forces, humans, and non-humans acting upon them.
We will operate within these gradations, positing that each constituent scale is distinct and can be considered on its own, yet the piece as a whole is only complete with each scale, resulting in the sum of all the small scales producing a large-scale total. [2] The studio engages with complex issues surrounding the political economy of space production, the actors, forces and mechanisms that generate the spaces we inhabit.

________________
[1] Race, space and architecture: towards an open-access curriculum, Tayob, Huda and Hall, Suzanne (2019) Race, space and architecture: towards an open-access curriculum. London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Sociology, London, UK.

Keywords

Architecture, systems, political economy, construction, actors

Learning Outcomes

By the end of the course, the student must be able to:

  • Map complex actor networks and capital flows in construction
  • Analyze how invisible actors shape what gets built
  • Identify intervention points within construction systems
  • Conduct original research across various media
  • Develop convincing final diagrams, drawings, renderings, simulations, physical and digital models.
  • Deploy design skills toward systemic change
  • Articulate strategies for representing complex-systems
  • Think critically about architecture's role and complicity in extractive industries
  • Develop abilities to work across scales: from material specifications to financial instruments to policy frameworks

Teaching methods

 

We believe that both bachelor's and master's students can engage meaningfully with the studio. While we understand that the complexities of the topic can be intimidating, we will deal with these from our respective perspectives, joyfully and hopefully, and we welcome everyone to join us in this process.

 

The structure and method of this studio follow prior RIOT-led design studios. As such, we do not recommend students take the studio with us more than once.

 


This is an experimental research-design studio- we hope to set the path for an innovative format where drawing research gets the full credits it deserves. Through a comprehensive exploration of the forces (economic, financial, legal, technological, material) that mandate, produce, control, and profit architecture and construction, we seek to expose how, why, and by whom architecture is made and unmade. We will investigate built works as case studies, unwrapping their genealogies, redrawing spatialities, tracing capital flows and actor networks from initial commission through motivations, financing, acquiring permissions, to design, construction, and operation. Our research will be grounded in actual sites and projects in Switzerland, as we seek to mobilize our context.
The studio also engages with critical readings on political economy, extractivism, construction labor, material supply chains, financial instruments, and regulatory frameworks-and other connected topics dear to the RIOT lab such as class, race and gender. These readings serve as analytical lenses to understand the complexities we encounter. Collective research works (mappings, diagrams, timelines) emerge towards a representational outcome of what was uncovered.
The goal is potentially, toward the end of the semester, to identify leverage points-namely where one could act or design intervention to alleviate the status quo. Because the studio conducts self-critical reflection on architecture's attachment to solutionism and building-as-default, we acknowledge the limitations and complicity of architectural practice within extractive systems. By focusing on understanding systems subtending individual buildings, this studio hopes to articulate an agenda for architectural research that acknowledges the complexity of construction, values and materiality and critique the political economy of space.

 

Expected student activities

 

We will deploy designers' skills and organizational abilities to understand, and transmit complex systems behind the production of space. We shall develop the ability to think critically about the status quo while exploring ways of engaging with both the built and unbuilt environments, pushing forward forms of spatial practice. For this, we will develop literacy in policy, economics, technology, intersectional activism, care, preservation, and other related fields, borrowing from different disciplines and learning to doubt while staying hopeful as we help planning disciplines pivot toward better practices of stewardship.

 

 

Assessment methods

 

The grading will be based on consistent engagement and learning/unlearning curve of the students with each episode in the Studio. The grades will be proportionately distributed over the episodes listed as follows. The studio relies on self-assessment questionnaires to help with the grading.

    Episode 01: 15%
    Episode 02: 20 %
    Episode 03: Phase 01 > 20 %
    Episode 03: Phase 02 > 30 %
    Reading Sessions & Overall Participation 15 %

Supervision

Office hours Yes
Assistant.e.s Yes

Resources

Virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI)

No

Bibliography

Political Economy

  • Deamer, Peggy, ed. Architecture and Capitalism: 1845 to the Present. New York: Routledge, 2014.
  • Deamer, Peggy, ed. The Architect as Worker: Immaterial Labor, the Creative Class, and the Politics of Design. London: Bloomsbury, 2015.
  • Deamer, Peggy. Architecture and Labor. New York: Routledge, 2020.
  • Malterre-Barthes, Charlotte. A Moratorium on New Construction. Berlin: Sternberg Press, 2025.
  • Tafuri, Manfredo. Architecture and Utopia: Design and Capitalist Development. Translated by Barbara Luigia La Penta. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1976.
  • Aureli, Pier Vittorio. The Project of Autonomy: Politics and Architecture within and against Capitalism. New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 2008.
  • Spencer, Douglas. The Architecture of Neoliberalism: How Contemporary Architecture Became an Instrument of Control and Compliance. London: Bloomsbury, 2016.
  • Martin, Reinhold. The Urban Apparatus: Mediapolitics and the City. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 201

Materials, Extraction

  • Moe, Kiel. Empire, State & Building. Barcelona: Actar, 2017.
  • Hutton, Jane. Reciprocal Landscapes: Stories of Material Movements. London: Routledge, 2020.
  • Forty, Adrian. Concrete and Culture: A Material History. London: Reaktion Books, 2012.
  • Gomez-Barris, Macarena. The Extractive Zone: Social Ecologies and Decolonial Perspectives. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2017.
  • Arboleda, Martin. Planetary Mine: Territories of Extraction under Late Capitalism. London: Verso, 2020.
  • Moore, Jason W. Capitalism in the Web of Life: Ecology and the Accumulation of Capital. London: Verso, 2015.
  • Tsing, Anna Lowenhaupt. The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2015.
  • Yusoff, Kathryn. A Billion Black Anthropocenes or None. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2018.

Race, Labor

  • Cheng, Irene, Charles L. Davis II, and Mabel O. Wilson, eds. Race and Modern Architecture: A Critical History from the Enlightenment to the Present. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2020.
  • Wilson, Mabel O. Negro Building: Black Americans in the World of Fairs and Museums. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2012.
  • McKittrick, Katherine. Demonic Grounds: Black Women and the Cartographies of Struggle. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2006.

Real Estate, Value

  • Soules, Matthew. Icebergs, Zombies, and the Ultra-Thin: Architecture and Capitalism in the Twenty-First Century. New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 2021.
  • Stevens, Sara. Developing Expertise: Architecture and Real Estate in Metropolitan America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2016.
  • Weber, Rachel. From Boom to Bubble: How Finance Built the New Chicago. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015.
  • Harvey, David. The Limits to Capital. Oxford: Blackwell, 1982.
  • Harvey, David. Rebel Cities: From the Right to the City to the Urban Revolution. London: Verso, 2012.
  • Sassen, Saskia. Expulsions: Brutality and Complexity in the Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014
  • regulations, governance
  • Easterling, Keller. Enduring Innocence: Global Architecture and Its Political Masquerades. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005.
  • LeCavalier, Jesse. The Rule of Logistics: Walmart and the Architecture of Fulfillment. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2016.
  • Cowen, Deborah. The Deadly Life of Logistics: Mapping Violence in Global Trade. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2014.
  • Mitchell, Timothy. Carbon Democracy: Political Power in the Age of Oil. London: Verso, 2011.

Drawing

  • Corner, James. "The Agency of Mapping: Speculation, Critique and Invention." In Mappings, edited by Denis Cosgrove, 213-252. London: Reaktion Books, 1999.
  • Kurgan, Laura. Close Up at a Distance: Mapping, Technology, and Politics. New York: Zone Books, 2013.
  • Nichols, Sarah. "Pollux's Spears." Grey Room, no. 71 (2018)

Archives

  • Tayob, Huda, Suzanne Hall, and Thandi Loewenson, curators. Race, Space and Architecture: An Open-Access Curriculum. 2020. https://www.racespacearchitecture.org. (Source of the "looking sideways in the archive" passage; see esp. the "Extracting" frame.)
  • Hartman, Saidiya. "Venus in Two Acts." Small Axe 12, no. 2 (2008): 1-14.
  • McKittrick, Katherine. Dear Science and Other Stories. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2021.
  • Azoulay, Ariella Aisha. Potential History: Unlearning Imperialism. London: Verso, 2019.
  • Frichot, Helene. Dirty Theory: Troubling Architecture. Baunach: AADR, 2019.
  • Schalk, Meike, Therese Kristiansson, and Ramia Maze, eds. Feminist Futures of Spatial Practice: Materialisms, Activisms, Dialogues, Pedagogies, Projections. Baunach: AADR, 2017.
  • Rendell, Jane. Art and Architecture: A Place Between. London: I.B. Tauris, 2006.
  • Maintenance
  • Fitz, Angelika, and Elke Krasny, eds. Critical Care: Architecture and Urbanism for a Broken Planet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2019.
  • Mattern, Shannon. "Maintenance and Care." Places Journal, November 2018. https://placesjournal.org.
  • Jackson, Steven J. "Rethinking Repair." In Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society, edited by Tarleton Gillespie, Pablo J. Boczkowski, and Kirsten A. Foot, 221-239. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2014.
  • The Care Collective. The Care Manifesto: The Politics of Interdependence. London: Verso, 2020.

Swissness

  • Diener, Roger, Jacques Herzog, Marcel Meili, Pierre de Meuron, and Christian Schmid. Switzerland: An Urban Portrait. Basel: Birkhauser, 2006.
  • Nichols, Sarah. "Concrete Stories." In Concrete in Switzerland: Histories from the Recent Past, edited by Salvatore Aprea, Nicola Navone, and Laurent Stalder. Lausanne: EPFL Press, 2021.

Ressources en bibliothèque

In the programs

  • Semester: Fall
  • Exam form: During the semester (winter session)
  • Subject examined: Studio BA5 (Malterre-Barthes)
  • Courses: 2 Hour(s) per week x 14 weeks
  • Project: 4 Hour(s) per week x 14 weeks
  • Type: mandatory
  • Semester: Fall
  • Exam form: During the semester (winter session)
  • Subject examined: Studio BA5 (Malterre-Barthes)
  • Courses: 2 Hour(s) per week x 14 weeks
  • Project: 4 Hour(s) per week x 14 weeks
  • Type: mandatory
  • Semester: Fall
  • Exam form: During the semester (winter session)
  • Subject examined: Studio BA5 (Malterre-Barthes)
  • Courses: 2 Hour(s) per week x 14 weeks
  • Project: 4 Hour(s) per week x 14 weeks
  • Type: optional
  • Semester: Fall
  • Exam form: During the semester (winter session)
  • Subject examined: Studio BA5 (Malterre-Barthes)
  • Courses: 2 Hour(s) per week x 14 weeks
  • Project: 4 Hour(s) per week x 14 weeks
  • Type: mandatory

Reference week

Monday, 8h - 12h: Project, labs, other

Monday, 13h - 18h: Project, labs, other

Tuesday, 8h - 10h: Lecture

Tuesday, 10h - 12h: Project, labs, other

Tuesday, 15h - 18h: Project, labs, other

Related courses

Results from graphsearch.epfl.ch.